Monday, November 17, 2008

Struggles for Modern Man (and Woman)

Sit through an intro literature class. There are five classic struggles that man (and women, though they were created back before women were quite worth mentioning) could face in the scope of a story. These struggles are no way limited to the narrative. They also sum up pretty well the challenges of real life.

As humankind has developed through history, so to has its ability to cope with these challenges. Indeed, today we are much safer from many of the things that worried our ancestors.

Let's take them one at a time...

Man vs. Nature
Poisonous plants, hostile elements, hungry beasts.

Through systematic classifications, better building practices, meteorology, weapons of self defense and disaster planning we have vastly improved our ability to cope with the natural world. Do you often doubt if you will "make it through winter?" Nope. While the occasional extreme climate event may displace millions, the causalities are usually kept to a minimum in countries with efficient and reactive rescue infrastructures.

Man vs. Man
Theft, murder, deceit.

While our fellow humans still can pose a threat to us, we have locks on our doors, personal firearms, security systems, fraud protection, banks, and safety service personnel. Apart from getting stuck in long lines behind masses of your fellow humans, we tend not to be put at odds with each other as often as in the past. Murder, after all, has been on a steady decline on the western world for 700 years.

Man vs. Society
Oppressive social norms and practices.

This one still gets us from time to time, but things are getting a bit better. The internet offers community for the outcasts, social mobility allows people to relocate and start anew, courts exist to try to bring justice to all. While we are certainly still subject to the world in which we live, there seems to be a growing sense of multiplicity, at least allowing people to have more choice about what world that is.

Man vs. the Supernatural
God, destiny, demons, the Fae.

If these entities are real... they have gotten trickier over the years. We rarely face the supernatural in an overt showing of power, and there are many who outright deny their existence and refuse to deal with them as such. I certainly don't discount their existence, and while I wouldn't say that humanity on the whole has improved in its coping with these struggles, it is true that many religions have "softened" their hard lines in favor of a more open ideology.

and finally...

Man vs. Himself
Restraint, fear, doubt

I don't believe that in the thousands of years of human existence we have improved in regard to this challenge. In fact, in the modern world, this is the prevailing worry. Is Mother Nature going to squash humanity under her thumb? Not likely. But could humanity, in its unrestrained self indulgence, destroy the world and itself in the process? Its seems a growing possibility.

In the midst of developing technology, developing social structures, developing interpersonal models, developing health care, developing building techniques, developing science, developing economics, developing spiritual communities, developing governments, and developing infrastructures... humans aren't really developing.

Imagine the possibilities of better tools, better communities, better relationships, better medicine, better housing, better learning, better business, better prayer, better laws, and better transportation. Wouldn't it seem that with all that better, the world would be so much better?

But is it? Some days I think so. But other days I look around, and I see people up to the same old tricks. New systems become sites for new domination. New resources create new poverties. New rules create new bad rulers. Without self restraint, without the ability to challenge the self, no advancement in the struggle against nature, others, society or the supernatural will ever lead to better lives. The man with no self mastery will squander most of the resources afforded by the other advancements... and the ones that he cannot somehow toss aside, he will learn to ignore out of indolent ingratitude. Soon, the near utopia around him comes to reflect the inner wasteland he never addressed.

We need to quit driving and eating the world into glacieral melting. Quit spending into oppressive deficit. Quit channeling our stress and negativity onto all around.

We are among the most powerful people to have ever walked the earth. We have risen to nearly every challenge. Now its its time to meet the one power who's power grows as fast as us. Our own. Humans are no longer infants wailing for their next meal. We have advanced and developed power in this world.

It is time we wielded that power with a more mature outlook.

Sometimes it seems, that the more powerful someone becomes, the more self righteous they become. The great can do no wrong. But in reality, this is precisely the opposite of true. As we become great, our actual ability to do wrong increases with our power.

If we ever want to see the greatest good come to pass, we must commit ourselves to besting ourselves. We must be devoted to live out our better natures, seek our better destinies, and become our better selves.

True. We have yet to explore space at warp speed. Yet it is our inner struggle, Man vs. Himself, not space, that in our future days will prove to be the final frontier.

10 comments:

SpinKick said...

The only problem is that a singular human being only has one lifetime in which to learn. All of our developments etc people can look back on hundreds of years worth of information and slowly build over decades and centuries.

Of course each human has the resources and a million self help books to see the big picture and make amazing strides. But not everyone has the same capacity for this. It takes each human a different amount of time to figure themselves out, or even WANT to figure themselves out. Far too many remain oblivious their whole lives.

So take thousands of years of advancement and compare it to the average lifespan of a single human. Each person only has that amount of time to develop and implement and then they are done. And the cycle starts over from infancy. Literally.

Tim Huffman said...

Seriously good point. Can I steal that idea?

Elizabeth said...

Kristen makes a very good point about the necessary ability and desire of an individual.

This comes off very authoritative and condescending, making it difficult to hear the message through the battle cry. It's especially difficult for someone who hasn't yet come to the requisite personal awareness level.

Tim Huffman said...

Authoritative I'm ok with.

Condescending is a little more of a problem. I'd prefer inspiring...

What part do you find condescending? I will admit its sort of a throwing cold water entry... not a feel good message here. Is there a way to preserve this sense of "We must do this," and not blast people in a way that ends their openness to the argument.

I don't really want to blast anyone, that certainly isn't the point. I have no hate. But I do have outrage. We do f-up things of value in our ignorance, greed, and self centeredness. And it's bad.

So, I want to keep that sense of moral responsibility, and I don't think our so called cultural values ameliorate the moral situation.

But, I don't want to be a bastard either. I want people to feel challenged, maybe even overwhelmed by the seriousness of the situation. But I want them to then be inspired to do something.

Can I have it both ways?

Elizabeth said...

I'm going to say you can't.

I'm no authority on rabble rousing, so maybe you can. But from my experience all you can do is give them the facts and your thoughts in a non-offensive manner. I suspect harsh words will only harden people against your position, (evidence: 2008 election discussions).

I started a project of my own a few months back. It's a movement rather than a book, but the basis is the same. It's a cause I'd say I've long believed it, but one bike ride the true immensity of it just hit me in a way no outside influence could have ever stirred in me. I want desperately for others to feel as passionate as I do, but I know that there are many who tried and failed to rally me. It wasn't words that did it for me, hence my more Franciscan approach: a tiny little, large-scale movement.

So my suggestion would be to talk softly and let God carry the big stick.

Tim Huffman said...

Hmmm.

Must think on this. I think sometimes when you clearly identify a particular side, you offend all those who don't agree, and inspire those who do.

Powerful worlds can rouse people out of a lukewarm existence. Some people react well to being challenged. I mean, some people think you are a freak, but that's part of the terrain.

Mind fielding another question? I am being offensive by speaking harshly and loudly. Who am I offending? Do you have a sense of the people that I'm hardening to my position?

Elizabeth said...

Who are you offending? humans.

Take this post. You start by making a very keen observation, but then you transition: "Soon, the near utopia around him comes to reflect the inner wasteland he never addressed." And then goes on to make broad unsubstantiated exclamations.

Anyone who isn't exactly on the same page just feels beaten up without even really knowing why.

I think a good point is far more powerful than insults. So make your good point and let it sink in, or offer positive suggestions as to how to enact it.

If you were talking face to face to a real person, you would be far more encouraging and offer real answers, rather than just ranting about how they aren't doing it right.

Unknown said...

Humans? All of them?

I didn't know that the idea that humans are growing in power but not in wisdom (which is f-ing things up) was that offensive of a notion.

We are f-ing things up. That is a reality. And there are days I can't stand it. Can't stand the sweat shops. Can't stand the carbon emissions. Can't stand the meat factories. Can't stand the bloodshed.

Some days I want to scream. I want to shake the world so it stops spinning and everything just stops killing and maiming.

Now, I have the utmost respect for your more subtle path. Franciscan, Taoist, whatever spirituality it reminds you of, its admirable to the extreme. Just being a good role model is one of my basic goals in life. (Teaching and ministry hardly make sense if role modeling isn't feasible.)

But there are times that I am sick of being just an example. There I stand, virtuously abstaining from some wrongdoing, and yet, motionless to protect, petrified in my hesitation to offend.

Ultimately, all issues need templars and exemplars. Those willing to fight for the cause, and those who hold it close to their heart.

Elizabeth said...

I wouldn't say the idea itself is so offensive, as the way you tend to go about expressing it.

You call us immature babies when you are likely to be younger than most people reading your book and tell us to quit participating in a barrage of abstract cause and effect without explaining to us on what authority you berate us.

Unleashing your rage on people comes off like the drill sergeant types they bring onto talk shows to straighten out punk children, and maybe that's the look you're going for. Though if that's the case, condescension and offense would intentionally be part of your toolset.

Tim Huffman said...

Sometimes we are immature children.

That's a fact.

On the authority bit, its true, I don't set up an external value system. I also am still sussing out who I want the character of the narration to be.

Your point on the abstractness of the cause and effect is also well taken. In order for my point to float, I need to have narrative connection between the immature, childish activity and the mayhem that ensues.

As far as being a drill sergeant... I just don't see it. I've reread the post a few times now (though I suspect there are more entries that offend since you use the word "tend"), and I don't see condescending.

Maybe its there. If I had to guess, the rhetoric has no patience for 1.) people unwilling to critically evaluate their lives and make positive change, 2.) people who refuse to imagine and work, 3.) skeptical relativists, and 4.) narrow mindedness.

Perhaps I need to consider how to lull them along... but I'm not sure that's this project.

I want to be the verbalization of a growing angst that rails against hopelessness, meaninglessness, and illusion. Cut the crap. Be honest about what it is you do. Be grateful for what you have. Marvel in the glory of the power that created the world, and get to work.

I think I'm encouraging a radical liberal fundamentalism. Accept these basic loving and beautiful truths about the universe, let them become your only dogma, cutting the rest out as moral noise, and seek to transform the status quo to establish these eternal truths by using excellent thinking and a well developed heart.

If someone is convinced that their psudo-morality is more important than the thriving of real creatures, I call that a problem.

If someone is convinced that nothing can be done, I call that a problem.

If someone is convinced that only the self is important, I call that a problem.

If someone is convinced that only the other is important, I call that a problem.

If someone has become morally lazy, I call that a problem.

Now, all problems that have solutions... that of course being why its worth even talking about this stuff.